(Continued from p.4)
within the Green Line, supplies 400 million c.m. annually, though most of the water is polluted by industrial sewage and excessive salination and therefore is unfit for drinking and is directed primarily to industry and agriculture.Hence, the State of Israel within the 1949 borders will relinquish most of the water under its control and be left with a sewage canal. The solutions recommended are desalination, importing water from Turkey or Yugoslavia, towing icebergs from the North Pole and liquidating agriculture, which utilizes 1.2 billion c.m. annually. Towing icebergs from the North Pole is a pathetic expression of Jewish madness, but the other suggestions are not much saner. The default option will therefore be the liquidation of agriculture, which is already in its early stages.
8. The Palestinian State
In Oslo, the Israeli government signed an agreement with an organization which was at that time, and remains today, committed to the destruction of the State of Israel. This is expressed in its name, "Palestine Liberation Organization; in its "constitution," the Palestinian Charter; in its political platform, the "doctrine of stages," which presents the establishment of the state as a springboard for the destruction of Israel; and in its emblem, a map of all of Western Israel with no mention of the Jewish state.
The first four actions which "Palestine" will take upon its establishment include:
a. It will sign a military cooperation agreement with Arab states, almost certainly with Egypt and Syria. Israel will be unable to do anything about it in the context of international law, which allows a sovereign state to sign strategic treaties with whomever it pleases, and certainly will be able to do nothing in terms of military action, thanks to its strategic inferiority given the lack of viable borders.
b. It will demand that Israel retreat to the partition borders. The international community will support this demand, as those are the borders estabilshed by the United Nations for Israel in 1947, and are the only borders regarding which there is international consensus.
c. It will deepen the schism within Israeli society as it develops into "a state of its citizens," that is, work to liquidate the Jewish state by internal subversion. The steady, ever-deepening demoralization of the Jewish public will be exacerbated by the cooperation between Arab irredentism and the Jewish left.
d. It will tilt the demographic balance in Israel in favor of the Arabs by inundating the country with "refugees" presently in Jordan, Syria and Lebanon. The flooding of Israel within the "Green Line" will be accomplished through the demand -- given as an ultimatum -- to reunite families, return property of 1948 refugees or alternatively pay exorbitant reparations which will undermine Israel's economy. (The most absurd aspect of the refugee issue is the composition of the multilateral committee on the refugee problem, which includes the Palestinians, to whom the right of return is a national canon, Jordan, for whom expulsion of its Palestinians is a national interest and Egypt, which incessantly announces that without resolutiion of the refugee problem, there will be no peace in the Middle East. All decisions are taken with a simple majority.)
One of the fascinating issues in history is the question of who creates the critical mass which leads to fateful decision the decision-makers or the public at large? This issue is especially critical in democratic regimes, where public opinion plays a crucial role in determining the fate of decision-makers. In this matter public opinion polls indicate that the ruling elite in Israel, as embodied by the four Prime Ministers mentioned earlier, represents the national consensus.
One key question is the matter of the Palestinian state. Since its establishment by Nasser in 1964, the PLO has been perceived as the spearhead of the Arab struggle to destroy Israel. This assumption reflected
Who creates the critical mass which leads to fateful decisions-- the decision-makers or the public?
In a 1997 survey, a majority of Jews (51%) supported establishment of a Palestinian state, although the pollsters assumed, accurately, that the respondents were inhibited by remnants of the former national consensus. They therefore asked a follow-up question: "Disregarding your personal preference, in your opinion, will a Palestinian state be established in the next ten years?" In 1991 (after 15 years of Likud rule), 48% responded in the affirmative and in 1996 75%, an overwhelming majority of the Jewish public. Surveys conducted in 1998 show a decisive majority of the Jewish public in support of a Palestinian state an overwhelming majority (81-85%) predicting that it will be established. As a result, since today's objective assessment is tomorrow's active sup-
(Continued on p.6)
September 1999 - 5 - Outpost