EXCUSE MEhave been a national referendum before the signing of Oslo 2.I wish I had attended the meeting between you and the English-speaking community and that it had taken place in an atmosphere of mutual respect and dialogue, which native-born Israelis have come to expect of us. I would have asked you, in my American-accented Hebrew, which one of your ministers recently maligned, one simple question: "Excuse me, Mr. Prime Minister, but just what is your mandate for your current policies?" If it is based on your electoral victory of three years ago, then you have gone too far. Your parliamentary majority is razor-thin, based on those who might not have the State of Israel's long-term security in mind and a few rookie politicians who most certainly have their short-term careers in mind. It was your angry words at the Wingate Institute that revealed what you feel to be the true source of the authority that drives you to continue your unpopular policies. Yours is a personal mandate, based on your having "fought for the land" and built it as a veteran Israeli political figure. In short, you believe that Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin, Chief of Staff during the Six Day War in which the disputed territories were captured, is now empowered by history to dispense with them. For your past achievements as Palmach commander during the War of Independence, as Chief of Staff, and as the Prime Minister who ordered the rescue mission to Entebbe, I have nothing but respect. But excuse me, Mr. Prime Minister, that kind of mandate just isn't the democratic sort that we "Anglos" are accustomed to, so I hope you'll understand our anger. In the past months, you have lashed out at those who live over the Green Line even though they have |
often risked their lives and livelihoods in what they considered to be a Zionist undertaking. You have recently alienated American Jewry, an important source of financial, legislative and moral backing for the State of Israel, by accusing them of having crossed the red lines of interference in your government's policies. Now, you have sent a message to those "Anglos" living in the U.S. and other countries, who might be considering aliya, that they are not wanted here.
Excuse me, Mr. Prime Minister, for being cynical, but your words sound uncannily like those of your partner in peace, Mr. Arafat, in his "pre-statesman" days. Back then, he tendered a 'Democratic Palestinian State' in which only those Jews who had arrived in Palestine before the "Zionist invasion" would be "allowed" to remain. Perhaps in the diminished Israel you are creating for us, there will only be room for those who fought for and built the State--and those who agree with Yitzhak Rabin.
It is true that the individual contributions of the majority of us "Anglos" are modest, but taken together with those of thousands of other immigrants from the former Soviet Union, Latin America, Europe and the Middle East, who work and serve in the army alongside Israelis who were born here, it is considerable. We call it Zionism. Living in Israel, our right to "judge its actions and directions" goes beyond the one vote we each cast every four years.
It allows us to sign petitions and protest peacefully against policies which endanger our children's future. We call that democracy. Excuse me, Mr. Prime Minister, you don't have to agree with us, but you should be listening to what we have to say. It is in matters of democracy that we "Anglos" have our most substantial contribution to make.
Eli Kenin is a freelance journalist living in Jerusalem. |
Ruth KingON MEETING ARAFATYasser Arafat, unregenerate terrorist thug and best pal of Shimon Peres, keeps enlarging his circle of Jewish acquaintances. Leaders of the National Jewish Community Relations Advisory Council met with him in New York in October, as did leaders of the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations. (Those members of the Conference who opposed the meeting ought to consider resigning from the Conference.) No doubt other Jewish groups will meet Arafat as well. The canny arch-murderer soothed NJCRAC and the Conference with his well-worn double talk of "peace," and avoided the invocations of jihad which he reserves for his Arab audiences. Forgotten, too, were the murders of innocent civilians in places like Maalot, Ankara, Brussels, Rome, Buenos Aires, Paris, the list is endless. |
After all, for the grandees of the Jewish organizations, the urge to dabble in statesmanship is too great to resist.
Where else could these self-righteous strutters preen? The cause of Israel permitted businessmen and philanthropists to become ambassadors without portfolio. They demand audiences with the President, with the Secretary of State, with legislators and with foreign heads of state--even the Pope found time to see them. And, when Rabin scolded them for a presumption of independence from strict adherence to the "peace cult," they recognized the fact that their "influence and access" would be curtailed, and their political meddling would come to an end. Like herded sheep, these "leaders" got back into line, and what better proof of loyalty to the Labor Party line than to give an audience to Arafat? Somehow, the dictionary and the thesaurus do not yield the proper epithet for these scoundrels. Nor |
Outpost - 6 - November 1995